Roots
of Diversity in Philippine Contemporary Art
Essay by Ronald Hilario
Philippine
art today exhibits an amazingly dynamic relationship between discourses,
forms, and styles. This is a unique point in the country's visual art
history. Previous to this, a single dominant discourse and group of
artists usually characterized "periods" in art history. It is only when
younger artists challenge the elder generation's aesthetic ideas do
changes in the dominant discourse come about. Thus, Philippine art history
is best seen as a succession of generations of artists. The trend of
contending generations in Philippine modem art began in the Post World
War II period of the 1940's when a group of Filipino abstract painters,
who called themselves the Neorealists, challenged the so-called mainstream
Fernando Amorsolo school of painting. Debates on the legitimacy of abstraction
between the two "schools" opened the field of the visual arts to the
discourses of Modernist aesthetics. The Neorealists (a.k.a. the 13 Moderns)
and their explorations of abstract style triggered an avalanche of artistic
activity and debate among young artists in the succeeding decades. Two
stylistic trends appeared in the abstract tradition. The first led to
the challenge of forming a Filipino "character" or idiom of expression
through abstraction. This approach is represented by the works of painters
Carlos Francisco, Hernando Ocampo, and Galo Ocampo and is characterized
by the use of abstracted form in the representation of local subject
matter and themes. The second trend was towards a more in-depth exploration
of the formal elements of art and the creation of non-objective art
forms. These concerns were addressed by the next generation of modernists.
The early 1950's saw the triumph of the modernists over the conservatives.
Thanks to the efforts of Lyd Arguilla of the Philippine Art Gallery
in showcasing the art of the young modernists, abstraction gained a
stronger foothold and soon became the dominant style. More informed
in the aesthetics of cubism, surrealism, and expressionism, these young
artists expanded the concern of Philippine visual arts from style to
a broader exploration of the formal elements of visual art. The first
non-representational paintings and sculptures appeared at this stage,
and were developed to a higher level by the third wave of artists who
came in during the 1960's to the 1970's. Some of the more active artists
in this period were Vicente Manansala, Napoleon Abueva, Jose Joya, Cesar
Legaspi, Arturo Luz, and Fernando Zobel. Texts on abstract art became
more available to artists in the 60's. Modernist art theories were introduced
and taught in the Philippine Fine Arts Schools by academics and artists
such as Rod Paras Perez and Roberto Chabet. Readings of these texts
paved the way for a more cerebral approach to art making. Conceptual
Art, Minimalism, and Performance Art made their debut in the country.
Artists also became more vocal about their works and some published
their ideas in art journals such the Philippine Supplement in the 70's.
The Marcos regime's patronage of the arts added muscle to many artists'
projects. The Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) Ð the centerpiece
of the First Lady Imelda Marcos' cultural program Ð was established
and became the home of non-objective art. During the tenure of artist-curators
Ray Albano and Roberto Chabet the CCP galleries were sites of numerous
abstract art exhibitions and performances. At the forefront of these
activities were Ray Albano, Gus Albor, Roberto Chabet, Mars Galang,
Ben Maramag, Lee Aguinaldo and David Medalla. Meanwhile the country
underwent major financial and political crises culminating in the imposition
of Martial Law in 1972. Social unrest began to spread in many parts
of the country. Student activism and Communist and Muslim separatist
movements rose with the various protest movements against Marcos. These
developments did not go unnoticed by artists. Artists like Jaime de
Guzman and Danilo Dalena painted their impressions and comments of the
prevailing social and political climate and started a trend of socially
engaged art. De Guzman painted expressionistic murals that touched on
topics like American Imperialism, revolution and dejection, much to
the irritation of the First Lady. DalenaÕs social commentary filled
canvases depicted faceless mobs as the dreary audience and decadent
participants at horse races, jai-alai and sweepstakes betting lines,
and religious processions. He expressed his political stand in his hard-hitting
and stinging editorial cartoons of the Marcos regime.